AI OUTPUT RISK

Find the AI claim with the most expensive failure mode.

ProofTTL ranks submitted outputs by consequence, then deeply verifies the highest-risk factual findings against accessible authoritative evidence.

FACT AUDIT

$1,500 fixed scope
10–25 outputs or claims
consequence ranking
highest-risk deep verification
evidence FOR and AGAINST
human approval
7-day watch

The problem

Not every questionable sentence deserves equal effort. The dangerous one is the claim that can create customer, compliance, financial, or reputational damage if it is wrong.

What the Fact Audit adds

10–25 real outputs or claims per Fact Audit
Consequence ranking before deep verification
Evidence FOR and AGAINST
Human approval before customer-facing publication
Seven-day watch on important findings

Example

An AI-generated product answer makes a factual promise a customer may rely on.

Submit the real outputs first.

No card is required for intake. ProofTTL confirms the scope before creating the exact $1,500 payment request.

See sample audit

RELATED USE CASES

View all solutions →

PRE-LAUNCH CLAIM AUDIT

Catch the correction while it is still an edit.

Pressure-test factual claims in launches, websites, reports, decks, and customer-facing material before publication.

DUE DILIGENCE CLAIMS

Do not let repetition masquerade as independent support.

Verify selected public claims used in vendor, procurement, partner, investment, or operational decisions.

WEBSITE FACT AUDIT

Check the facts your site keeps repeating after the evidence changes.

Audit important factual claims on a website or product surface against current public evidence.